“Riyad Mahrez in trouble for “swindling and use of forgeries

Riyad Mahrez is embroiled in a legal affair

Ten years later, Mahrez’s transfer from Le Havre to Leicester resurfaces: a criminal investigation for fraud and use of forged documents has been opened

The transfer of Riyad Mahrez from Le Havre AC (HAC) to Leicester City in 2014, which saw the French club receive a fee of 10 million euros, is under investigation for “fraud and use of forged documents,” according to the newspaper L’Équipe.

A British agent at the heart of the matter

The investigation was launched following a complaint from HAC against British agent Guy Tolmarsh. He allegedly presented a contract with the former club president, Jean-Pierre Louvel, committing to pay him a 10% bonus on Mahrez’s transfer fee if he moved from Leicester to another club. However, according to HAC’s new management, this contract is invalid and was never included in the transfer dossier.

Le Havre fights back

The Le Havre club has filed a complaint for “fraud and use of forged documents.” The case was initially closed without action, but HAC reopened proceedings in March 2023. So far, Riyad Mahrez, who is not implicated in the investigation, has not commented.

Persistent uncertainties

This case raises several questions:

• The validity of the contract presented by Guy Tolmarsh
• The motivations of the British agent
• The role played by former HAC president Jean-Pierre Louvel
• Potential impact on Le Havre AC

The ongoing investigation should clarify these uncertainties and determine the responsibilities of those involved.

Potential significant repercussions

If the allegations of fraud and use of forged documents are proven, Guy Tolmarsh could face legal action. Le Havre AC could also seek to recover the fee paid to the British agent. This affair could also impact Riyad Mahrez’s reputation.

An affair to monitor closely

The investigation into Riyad Mahrez’s transfer from Le Havre to Leicester is ongoing. It’s important to exercise caution and avoid jumping to conclusions. However, this case highlights potential pitfalls in football and the need for greater transparency in player transfers.