The elimination of Morocco against France in the World Cup quarter-finals continues to spark reactions. Among those weighing in is sports journalist Nabil Djellit, who delivered a notable analysis comparing the performance of the Lions of the Atlas to that of Senegal against the French. According to the columnist for France Football, L’Équipe, and RFI, the Lions of Téranga remain, so far, the team that troubled the French national side the most during this World Cup. This statement reignites the debate about the journeys of the two African representatives.
Against a very solid French team, Morocco never truly found the solutions to turn the tide. Walid Regragui’s men were dominated in most areas of the game and failed to replicate the performances that had taken them to the quarter-finals. Despite their fighting spirit, the Lions of the Atlas lacked offensive impact and control to put the world champions in difficulty, thus exiting the competition after a performance deemed disappointing by several experts.

After the match, Nabil Djellit emphasized Senegal’s performance against France just days earlier. For the journalist, the Lions of Téranga displayed a higher level than Morocco did against the French, especially during a large part of their clash. He believes the Senegalese team had the qualities needed to compete with the best nations in the tournament, but they failed to turn that potential into a lasting run.
“In the end, the best team I saw against France since the start of the competition is Senegal. They challenged the French for 45 minutes. And even Belgium for 85… The Lions blew their tournament. Clearly.” said Nabil Djellit. A strong statement that highlights the regrets surrounding Pape Thiaw’s men’s campaign. For the journalist, Senegal had more than enough to achieve a more ambitious run, but some mistakes and a lack of efficiency at key moments cost the team dearly.
This analysis highlights the contrast between the potential shown by Senegal and their final result. The Lions of Téranga demonstrated, in spurts, that they could compete with top-level teams. Their intensity, aggression in duels, and ability to push back their opponents convinced many observers. Yet, these strong performances were not enough to take them further in the competition, leaving a sense of frustration among supporters and pundits alike.
Nabil Djellit disappointed by Morocco: “Senegal was better against France” (read in comments) pic.twitter.com/p9iIVb8cSE
— SeneNews (@Senenews) July 10, 2026
Reflecting on the duel between France and Morocco, Nabil Djellit believes the superiority of the French was never in doubt. According to him, the gap in level between the two teams was visible throughout the match, and the Moroccans never found the resources to shake their opponents. “There was clearly a class difference between the two teams,” he analyzes, adding that France was “way too strong” and that Morocco “had no arguments to counter.” These comments are sure to fuel discussions about the respective performances of these two great African nations during this World Cup.




