The situation of the 18 Senegalese supporters detained in Morocco is becoming particularly concerning. Facing what they see as a “clear lack of guarantee for a fair trial” and a blatant disregard for the principle of defense rights, these detainees have made a radical decision: they will no longer appear before the magistrates until their legitimate demands are met. According to information provided by their lawyer, Me Patrick Kabou, his clients now refuse to attend hearings without first knowing the details of the charges against them and fully understanding them.
This boycott of the hearings is built around specific demands that the defense considers fundamental for respecting human rights and the right to a fair trial. The detainees first demand that the offenses they are accused of be clearly communicated to them in a language they understand. This request, which may seem basic, is essential for the accused to fully exercise their right to defense. Additionally, they insist that their lawyer have unrestricted and unconditional access to the Rabat Court of First Instance, as well as the ability to meet with them regularly, both in prison and at the court before the hearings. This requirement aims to ensure constant dialogue between the defender and his clients, a necessary condition for preparing a serious and effective defense.

Beyond these procedural points, the situation is worsened by concerns regarding the medical care of the detainees. Me Kabou emphasizes that despite several promises made by the authorities, one of the supporters still does not receive the necessary medical treatment, putting his health at risk. This failure is a major point of tension and underscores the seriousness of the situation, highlighting the violation of fundamental rights in detention.
As a sign of protest and to draw attention to their detention conditions, the 18 supporters are also continuing a hunger strike and vigil that began on Friday, February 6, 2026. This gesture, both symbolic and dramatic, reflects the deep distress of these citizens in the face of what they perceive as injustice and inhumane treatment.
Thus, the situation remains extremely tense and fragile. The Moroccan authorities are faced with a dual demand: to respect defense rights and ensure medical follow-up for the detainees, all while managing a conflict that could take on a diplomatic dimension, given the involvement of foreign citizens in this case. Adhering to fundamental legal principles is more crucial than ever to prevent escalation.




